Our expertise
The right experience for your particular context.
We begin with HR and people decisions for India GCCs. Suitability depends on the problem a practitioner has personally worked on, not just their job title.
Our advisory network is in formation. Engagements depend on confirmed expertise, availability, scope and agreed terms.
Explore the questions
Which decision is yours?
The question a review would isolate
Who has final authority over the hiring handover, and what evidence do they need?
Illustrative situation. Approval sits with headquarters, day-to-day decisions with India, and the setup partner’s remit ends at go-live — but nobody has written down where one stops and the next begins. Fictional example, not a client engagement.
Usually involved
- Global HR or business sponsor
- India site or function lead
- Setup partner with an ending scope
What a bounded review would clarify
- Who proposes, who decides and who acts
- Which approvals are real and which are assumed
- What the sponsor still has to resolve
Illustrative decision types, not a menu of confirmed services. Describe your version of this decision
Our matching standard
Look beyond
the biography.
- Personal responsibility for comparable work
- Relevant GCC stage and operating model
- Ability to produce the required deliverable
- Awareness of limits and dependencies
- Permission to participate and absence of conflicts
- Availability confirmed for the assignment
Expertise is specific.
So is approval.
A practitioner may be suitable for one decision and unsuitable for another. We distinguish experience, capability approval, availability and assignment clearance.
Community membership, a speaker appearance or past employment does not establish advisory suitability. We do not treat the wider HCI Talks community as a directory of available advisers.
Let’s start a conversation
A better decision starts with the right question.
Start with a short, nonconfidential brief.