Subject to specialist matching
Hiring governance
Clarify who decides, who assesses and who owns the handover.
Explore the operating choices behind hiring: approval rights, assessment ownership, stakeholder responsibilities and onboarding handovers. Define the system around hiring before it becomes a source of delay.
Discuss this serviceOur advisory network is in formation. Engagements depend on confirmed expertise, availability, scope and agreed terms.
When it helps
- A hiring wave is approaching with unresolved approvals.
- Assessment responsibilities differ between India, headquarters and partners.
- Selection or onboarding handovers have no agreed accountable owner.
What you receive
A practical work product, with depth and review agreed before the assignment.
A hiring decision-rights map
Assessment and handover responsibilities
A record of gaps and dependencies
Also proposed: prioritised next actions.
What we need from you
Start with the context. Detailed evidence follows an agreed, authorised process.
- An agreed hiring wave or business trigger
- Current approval and assessment workflow
- Internal and external partner responsibilities
- Known bottlenecks and sponsor expectations
Keep confidential documents out of the initial enquiry. Only share material you are authorised to provide.
Illustrative output
View sample
Explore a fictional ownership map and supporting documents in the sample viewer.Illustrative format, not client work. Exact outputs are agreed for your assignment.
Scope & boundaries
This proposed scope does not include:
- Candidate sourcing or placement
- Guaranteed hiring outcomes
- A recruitment mandate
Before we begin
How are fees and scope agreed?
The proposal names the practitioner and engagement owner, the question, inputs, deliverables, fees, review rounds and responsibilities. Nothing is booked by an enquiry.
Who makes the final decision?
Your sponsor retains employer accountability and the decisions reserved to your organisation. A Virtual CHRO or managed HR mandate can include agreed execution and coordination responsibilities; authority, access and exclusions are written into the engagement.
What happens if there is no suitable match?
A no-fit outcome is possible. Availability and specialist capability must be confirmed for the particular assignment before a proposal proceeds.